THE LATEST

Recently, a report by Hindenburg Research raised serious concerns about Super Micro Computer, Inc. (Nasdaq: SMCI) and its adherence to federal securities laws. The report suggests that the company may have provided misleading information to the public, casting doubt on the accuracy of its financial disclosures and corporate governance practices.

The report reveals troubling issues surrounding Supermicro, a well-known manufacturer of server and storage solutions based in San Jose, California. Despite being listed on the Nasdaq and included in major indices like the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq 100, the company is facing controversy due to allegations of improper revenue recognition and corporate governance concerns.

A significant focus of the report is the significant drop in Supermicro's gross margins, a departure from its historical performance. In previous fiscal years, the company consistently reported gross margins above 15%, but this figure plunged to 11.2% in Q4 2024. This sudden decline raises questions about the company's financial health and the sustainability of its business model.

Additionally, the report discusses governance concerns such as channel stuffing, deceptive revenue reporting practices, and improper revenue recognition. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) previously accused Supermicro of prematurely recognizing over $200 million in revenue from FY 2015 through FY 2017, leading to the company's delisting in 2018 and an SEC charge in 2020.

Of equal concern is the rehiring of key employees allegedly associated with past unlawful accounting actions. Despite the company's assertion that accounting issues were in the past following a settlement with the SEC in 2020, a lawsuit filed in 2024 alleges that individuals connected to past accounting scandals were reinstated, raising questions about the company's commitment to sound corporate governance practices.

The report also reveals the rehiring of individuals linked to previous accounting improprieties, including Howard Hideshima, who faced SEC charges for engaging in improper accounting practices. Despite these allegations, Hideshima was rehired as a consultant to a related entity of Supermicro, sparking concerns about accountability and ethical oversight within the organization.

As the investigation delves deeper into the web of financial misconduct and governance lapses, investors and industry observers are left grappling with the implications of these troubling revelations. The potential violations of federal securities laws highlighted in the report cast uncertainty over Super Micro's future trajectory and raise doubts about the company's commitment to transparency, integrity, and ethical business practices.

CoreWeave was Supermicro’s biggest customer in the last year, according to Bloomberg Intelligence. However, in December 2023, Dell revealed a deal with CoreWeave for "thousands" of GPU servers, potentially valued at over $1 billion.

Nvidia is a major partner and chip supplier for Supermicro. In May 2024, CEO Jensen Huang publicly endorsed Supermicro’s competitor: “Nobody is better at building end-to-end systems of very large scale for the enterprise than Dell.”

Given these concerning developments, stakeholders and regulatory bodies are urged to conduct a thorough review of Supermicro's financial practices, governance structures, and compliance mechanisms. The allegations of misleading business information and potential violations of securities laws underscore the critical importance of vigilance and accountability in safeguarding investor interests and upholding market integrity.

One of the main importers of Supermicro products in Russia is a supplier to one of Russia’s largest supercomputers at a formerly secret, now-sanctioned research center. This importer, Niagara Computers, has received at least $46.3 million worth of Supermicro products since the start of the Russia-Ukraine war, according to trade data.

As Super Micro Computer, Inc. faces increased scrutiny, the need for greater transparency, ethical conduct, and robust governance practices becomes apparent, signaling a critical moment for the company and the broader supercomputing community as they grapple with the implications of these explosive allegations.